Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Spellslingers | __bmj__ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | pedraminator | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | katalmach | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | _falcon_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Oculus | atticus1806 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Legends , Grixis Bounce , Grixis Control , Grixis Crimes , Grixis Reanimator , Izzet Aggro , Izzet Artist's Monument , Izzet Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Spirebluff Canal ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Spirebluff Canal is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 50.20 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Spirebluff Canal has a win rate of 78.2%, making it 13.3% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 15 | 82.4% | 8 |
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 5 | 82.0% | 3 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 11 | 81.9% | 7 |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 20 | 79.9% | 10 |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 5 | 77.4% | 2 |
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 29 | 76.9% | 12 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 62 | 73.8% | 26 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 44 | 72.6% | 16 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 22 | 69.6% | 10 |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 6 | 68.8% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Spirebluff Canal than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 90.0% | 72.2% | +17.8% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 8 | 81.8% | 73.2% | +8.6% |
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 9 | 89.7% | 81.5% | +8.3% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 11 | 85.9% | 79.8% | +6.1% |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 53 | 80.9% | 75.1% | +5.8% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 25 | 79.6% | 74.1% | +5.5% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 19 | 80.5% | 75.3% | +5.2% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 38 | 78.7% | 73.9% | +4.9% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 31 | 79.3% | 74.7% | +4.6% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 22 | 80.0% | 75.5% | +4.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Convoke | 546 | 98.4% | 48.6% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 258 | 100.0% | 50.3% |
| Temur Otters | 127 | 37.9% | 29.5% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 95 | 100.0% | 68.1% |
| Unknown Archetype | 25 | 8.0% | 38.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.